tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post6503681287694404275..comments2024-03-25T14:32:49.990-04:00Comments on Princess Palace: 12 Royal Reasons the World Can't EndCheryl Ciucevichhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00388994160381820590noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post-88510605623153249482013-01-23T19:07:09.685-05:002013-01-23T19:07:09.685-05:00I think Kate doesn't wear tiaras because she h...I think Kate doesn't wear tiaras because she has not been invited to tiara events. Despite the Jubilee last year--which did not have tiara events--which brought her greater prominence, she and William have still tried to keep a lower profile. Also, since she is married to a grandson of the monarch rather than the child of the monarch, she is in a less prominent position unlike the Queen's daughter-in-law The Countess of Wessex, who often represents the Queen at foreign royal events. After the birth of the baby this summer and William's career change, Kate may take on more of the "big princess" events that include more tiaras. Of course, once Charles becomes king, she will be the wife of the Heir and will be VERY prominent then. Cheryl Ciucevichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00388994160381820590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post-45724848494105665852013-01-15T13:51:03.550-05:002013-01-15T13:51:03.550-05:00why do you think Kate doesn't wear another tia...why do you think Kate doesn't wear another tiara again? is she trying to be deliberately humble and low key? if so it's a sweet gesture but wish she wasn't that low key! even Sophie's had many occasions to wear tiaras..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post-35927654774048470642012-12-16T19:40:12.125-05:002012-12-16T19:40:12.125-05:00Yes, my tweet was a bit cryptic and that was inten...Yes, my tweet was a bit cryptic and that was intentional. Wanted to draw your attention without being too obvious. <br /><br />Very nice post. Fingers crossed the world doesn't end. We may never see those little girls inherit the throne in our life time but we only have less than nine months to wait for Kate's baby. Genuinely hoping it is a girl. Just like I did with Victoria and Estelle. It would be historic. Marilyn Braunhttp://www.marilynsroyalblog.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post-64637675337900562892012-12-14T12:53:56.004-05:002012-12-14T12:53:56.004-05:00She is not 339 years old; she was 339 when she had...She is not 339 years old; she was 339 when she had her last child. Obviously she has aged since then. Ha! Seriously, thanks for catching the error, Marilyn. Didn't understand it from your tweet, but I have corrected it now.<br /><br />You are also correct, I believe, on every other point that you outline. Cheers!Cheryl Ciucevichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00388994160381820590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3343837766028558539.post-88323095505930922232012-12-14T08:48:54.067-05:002012-12-14T08:48:54.067-05:00I didn't know Akishino's wife was 339 year...I didn't know Akishino's wife was 339 years old! She looks really good for her age. ;)<br /><br />So many royal events to look forward to. I especially like the fact that there will be queens on many of the European thrones. No guarantees on Leonor, though I hope she will inherit the throne, even if her parents have a baby brother. <br /><br />I'm looking forward to Kate having a girl. Judging by the media coverage, I think others feel the same way. Since the rules are being changed and considering the grand tradition of British queens I have my fingers crossed for a little girl.<br /><br />Somehow I doubt that Greece will come back, or that Aiko will become empress. Because of her male cousin, there is no longer a pressing need to make such a change. I hope that they will change the rules but somehow I doubt it. <br /><br />I think that Camilla will be styled Queen. Prince Charles continued his relationship with Camilla despite public opinion. She was non-negotiable. I think having her as Duchess of Cornwall instead of Princess of Wales was pandering to the public. Diana wasn't the only one who was Princess of Wales. Now that Camilla has proven herself to be an asset to the monarchy, people might be more willling to accept her as Queen Camilla. Marilyn Braunhttp://www.marilynsroyalblog.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com