21 July 2014

Happy Birthday: Three Royal Girls Who Are Ahead of George

Prince George
Unless you are living under a bridge, you are likely aware that Prince George of Cambridge is celebrating his first birthday this week. But as adorable as he is--and who could resist those cheeks!--there are still three people standing between him and the throne. George is the only royal heir who is still waiting in line behind a parent, a grandparent, and a great-grandparent. Meanwhile, other royal kiddies are first in line behind only their daddies. And, as it happens, all three of these little darlings are princesses! So, let's take a look at the tiny girls who will be Queens probably long before A-George-Able of Cambridge gets his crown.

The youngest of this trio is The Princess of the Asturias, also known as Infanta Leonor. At just eight years old, she has been the Heiress Presumptive in Spain for just about a month since her grandfather's abdication. As an infant, Leonor was renowned for her Shirley Temple-esque curls (cuteness factor = sky high!) and impish grin. In recent years, she has become an admirable big sister to Infanta Sofia, and the two are occasionally dressed in coordinating but stylish outfits. It is expected that, like her father King Felipe, Leonor will pursue advanced degrees in international studies and military training when the time comes. Although Spain has dabbled with Salic Law, barring women from the throne during parts of its history, it actually has a rich history of reigning queens, including the most famous Isabella, who funded Columbus, and most recently the much less admired Isabella II in the nineteenth century.

In Belgium, on the other hand, 12-year-old Elisabeth Duchess of Brabant will be the first ever Queen Regnant when she eventually succeeds her father King Philippe. The royal Heir Apparent for just over a year, she also earned her place as first in line following a grandfather's abdication. However, she benefited from a change in royal succession law that was enacted a decade before her birth. If Belgium had not adopted absolute primogeniture, she would have had to cede her place to her younger brothers Prince Gabriel and Prince Emanuel, since male's had previously been given preference over their older sisters. She also has a baby sister, Princess Eleonore. In a nation divided by two distinctive cultures, Elisabeth's education has also been groundbreaking; previous royal heirs were educated primarily in French, but she has been educated in Dutch.

Our third young royal lady is Catharina-Amalia The Princess of Orange, who is the Heir Apparent of her father King Willem Alexander of The Netherlands. Like her two cohorts, abdication moved her into her current position, but in this case it was her grandmother who stepped down following what has become an established retirement tradition for Dutch monarchs over the last century. Amalia's granny Queen (now Princess) Beatrix was the third Reigning Queen in a row, and she was the third to voluntarily relinquish her throne. Unlike Leonor and Elisabeth, whose mothers are both native to their countries, Amalia has a more exotic background--her mum, the exuberant and brightly dressed Queen Maxima--hails from Argentina. She is the first woman born in the New World to serve as a European consort. Although ten-year-old Amalia did not have to worry about being superceded by a little brother, she has two little sisters, Princess Alexia and Princess Ariane. In fact, in the last four generations of the Dutch royal family, princes were only born in her dad's generation.

Elsewhere in Europe, where the current heirs are adults, the throne of Sweden will pass next to a woman Crown Princess Victoria followed by her daughter Princess Estelle and the heir-in-waiting after Crown Prince Haakon in Norway is another little girl, his daughter Princess Ingrid Alexandra. At least George will have one male colleague on the continent: the junior heir in Denmark (after Crown Prince Frederik) is a boy, Prince Christian.


28 June 2014

Anyone Can Be a Princess

Sofia Hellqvist, new fiancee of 
Prince 
Carl Philipp of Sweden
Once upon a time, to become a princess, you had to get a very good start in life. You had to pick your father well--preferably an emperor, a king, or a powerful duke. You had to behave yourself. You had to keep your opinions to yourself. And, you should definitely avoid developing a "past." (Read my 2009 post, How to Become a Princess)

Good news, modern ladies!! Absolutely none of those rules apply today. With yesterday's announcement of Prince Carl Philipp of Sweden's engagement to long-time live-in love Sofia Hellqvist, the change in royal princess qualifications has once again been reconfirmed. It has not been so long since the idea of a royal bride of less than equal rank was scandalous (see my post, Unequal Marriage Equals Happy Marriage?) Even in the 1970s, Carl Philipp's dad had to wait to become King in order to change the dynastic rules so that he could marry Carl Philipp's non-royal, non-noble mother.

Even more recently, Prince Charles was coaxed (forced?) into marrying the virginal Lady Diana Spencer and his brother Prince Andrew was criticized for dating soft-porn actress Kathleen "Koo" Stark. Just a generation later, however, a royal prince is about to marry a young woman who built her reputation as a reality TV personality and nude calendar pin-up girl.

But Sofia is just the latest in steady line of loosening protocols regarding royal marriage partners. After all, Princess Stephanie of Monaco and Princess Anne of Great Britain both married royal staff members in the 1990s. In 2004, the new King Felipe of Spain married Letizia Ortiz Rocasolano, a woman who had been previously married. And, a few years before that, the Crown Prince of Norway caused a stir by making a princess out of a single mother, Mette-Marit Tjessem-Hoiby.

With Prince Harry's private parts having been shared around the globe and The Duchess of Cambridge's topless pics still alive and well on the Internet, plus the recently retired King Juan Carlos of Spain's philandering ways, the Prince of Monaco's acknowledged illegitimate children, and Infanta Cristina being indicted for fraud, is it any wonder that so many royals have fallen victim to tabloidization? Is it just that their exploits are more exposed or are the royals truly more inclined to "let the side down"? The days of stiff upper lips are rapidly passing away. When we lose, Queen Elizabeth II, will everything begin to slip into the mists of history?

Now that European monarchs have little real power and are completely dependent upon popular goodwill for their status, I am concerned that we are seeing the last generation of royalty playing its way across the stage. If the royals are now being portrayed--and sometimes deservedly so--as little better behaved than Kardashians, why should they be held up as the titular heads of nations?

Sixty-ish years ago, King Farouk of Egypt predicted that soon there would be only five kings left--the King of Clubs, the King of Spades, the King of Hearts, the King of Diamonds, and the King of England.

He may have overestimated.

(For links to other bloggers' coverage of the Swedish engagement, visit my other blog, Royal Blog Central.)